GeForce 910M vs 8800M GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX and GeForce 910M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800M GTX
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
1.20

910M outperforms 8800M GTX by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1068983
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.273.18
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameG92GK208B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2007 (17 years ago)13 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed500 MHz641 MHz
Number of transistors754 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0020.51
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.4923 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MBDDR3 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s16.02 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8800M GTX 1.20
GeForce 910M 1.53
+27.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800M GTX 462
GeForce 910M 589
+27.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTX 3422
GeForce 910M 4325
+26.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−28.6%
9
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Valorant 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−11.1%
30
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 1−2
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

This is how 8800M GTX and GeForce 910M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 910M is 29% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 910M is 133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 910M is ahead in 28 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.53
Recency 1 November 2007 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 33 Watt

GeForce 910M has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 97% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 910M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX or GeForce 910M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.