RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTX SLI
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
2.04

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms 8800M GTX SLI by a whopping 1640% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data87.80
Power efficiency1.0935.10
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXGA106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date19 November 2007 (16 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923328
Core clock speed500 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.987 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1614%
600−650
+1614%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1614%
600−650
+1614%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1614%
600−650
+1614%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−1627%
190−200
+1627%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 35.50
Recency 19 November 2007 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has a 1640.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 712.5% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 136 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.