FirePro V7900 SDI vs GeForce 8800 GTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking971not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG80Cayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)24 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5751280
Core clock speed576 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors681 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8658.00
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs3280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mm279 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount768 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 224 Watt

8800 GTX has 44.5% lower power consumption.

V7900 SDI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTX and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTX is a desktop card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.