Radeon E9171 MCM vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG80Lexa
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 February 2007 (17 years ago)3 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed513 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistors681 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate24.6239.01
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs2016
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount320 MB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2007 3 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 320 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 40 Watt

E9171 MCM has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1180% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 257.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and Radeon E9171 MCM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop card while Radeon E9171 MCM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
Radeon E9171 MCM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9171 MCM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.