Tesla C870 vs GeForce 8800 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1127not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (16 years ago)2 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Core clock speed550 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors754 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4038.40
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs1224
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount384 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 2 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 171 Watt

8800 GS has an age advantage of 8 months, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 62.9% lower power consumption.

Tesla C870, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Tesla C870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop card while Tesla C870 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
NVIDIA Tesla C870
Tesla C870

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.