Playstation 3 GPU 65nm vs GeForce 8800 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1131not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG92RSX-65nm
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2008 (16 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors754 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4013.20
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128
TMUs4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount384 MB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3ES 1.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 58 Watt

8800 GS has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Playstation 3 GPU 65nm, on the other hand, has 81% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Playstation 3 GPU 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop card while Playstation 3 GPU 65nm is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
NVIDIA Playstation 3 GPU 65nm
Playstation 3 GPU 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Playstation 3 GPU 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.