GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile vs 8700M GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1306not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84AD104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2007 (17 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores327280
Core clock speed625 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors289 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00399.6
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS24.24 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 175 Watt

8700M GT has 503.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8700M GT and GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 8700M GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 20 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.