Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GeForce 8600M GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated40
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.96
Power efficiencyno data16.54
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 December 2007 (16 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323456
Core clock speed475 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistors289 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate7.600549.5
Floating-point processing power0.0608 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600M GT 112
RX 7700 XT 22428
+19925%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8600M GT 1040
RX 7700 XT 126733
+12086%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 December 2007 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 245 Watt

8600M GT has 1125% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT and Radeon RX 7700 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GT is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M GT
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1417 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.