GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs 8600M GT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600M GT and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600M GT
2007
512 MB DDR2, 20 Watt
0.29

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 8600M GT by a whopping 12752% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1336128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0022.29
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG84GA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 December 2007 (16 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325120
Core clock speed475 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors289 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate7.600249.6
Floating-point processing power0.0608 TFLOPS15.97 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8600M GT 0.29
RTX 3070 Mobile 37.27
+12752%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600M GT 112
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+12725%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8600M GT 1040
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+7318%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1116
1440p0−174
4K-0−145

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5850%
119
+5850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
107
+5250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2750%
114
+2750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1863%
150−160
+1863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3275%
130−140
+3275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−350%
120−130
+350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−6167%
188
+6167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4300%
88
+4300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2550%
106
+2550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1863%
150−160
+1863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4475%
183
+4475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−756%
75−80
+756%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−546%
181
+546%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3600%
74
+3600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1550%
132
+1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4100%
168
+4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−944%
94
+944%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−114%
60
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 47
Hitman 3 6−7
−1033%
68
+1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5500%
112
+5500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 33

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+0%
91
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+0%
81
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82
+0%
82
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+0%
53
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125
+0%
125
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 159
+0%
159
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 38
+0%
38
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
+0%
71
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+0%
27
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 6167% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 37.27
Recency 31 December 2007 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 125 Watt

8600M GT has 525% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 12751.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600M GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1904 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.