Matrox Parhelia 256 MB vs GeForce 845M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking694not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.34no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGM108Parhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 August 2015 (9 years ago)25 June 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1071 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1176 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate37.630.8
Floating-point processing power0.9032 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2015 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GeForce 845M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 845M and Matrox Parhelia 256 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 845M is a notebook card while Matrox Parhelia 256 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 845M
GeForce 845M
Matrox Parhelia 256 MB
Parhelia 256 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 23 votes

Rate GeForce 845M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 10 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 256 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.