Riva TNT2 PRO vs GeForce 840M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 787 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.96 | no data |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | Fahrenheit (1998−2000) |
| GPU code name | GM108 | NV5 B6 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 (10 years ago) | 12 October 1999 (25 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 143 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 15 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 250 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 0.29 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8632 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 2 |
| TMUs | 16 | 2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 4x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1001 MHz | 167 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 2.672 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
| Optimus | + | - |
| GameWorks | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 6.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 March 2014 | 12 October 1999 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 250 nm |
GeForce 840M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 840M and Riva TNT2 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook card while Riva TNT2 PRO is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
