Quadro P2200 vs GeForce 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 840M with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 840M
2014
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.83

P2200 outperforms 840M by a whopping 756% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking795231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.8822.15
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM108GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed1029 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98119.4
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs1680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 840M 2.83
Quadro P2200 24.23
+756%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 840M 1092
Quadro P2200 9335
+755%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 840M 5748
Quadro P2200 32445
+464%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce 840M 4992
Quadro P2200 31058
+522%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GeForce 840M 5561
Quadro P2200 29989
+439%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
−678%
350−400
+678%
Full HD17
−724%
140−150
+724%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Hitman 3 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−718%
180−190
+718%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Hitman 3 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−718%
180−190
+718%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−726%
190−200
+726%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Hitman 3 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−718%
180−190
+718%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−733%
50−55
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Hitman 3 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

This is how GeForce 840M and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 678% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P2200 is 724% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 24.23
Recency 12 March 2014 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 840M has 127.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 756.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 840M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 938 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 365 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.