PG506-232 vs GeForce 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking787not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.19no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed1029 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98322.6
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s933.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2014 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 165 Watt

GeForce 840M has 400% lower power consumption.

PG506-232, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 840M and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 913 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.