Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce 840A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking786not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.06no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM108Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843456
Core clock speed1029 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98432.0
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB28 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 158 Watt

GeForce 840A has 378.8% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 840A and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 840A is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GeForce 840A
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 14 votes

Rate GeForce 840A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.