HD Graphics P4700 vs GeForce 840A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking778not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameGM108Haswell GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384160
Core clock speed1029 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate17.9826.00
Floating-point performance0.8632 gflops0.416 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.80
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 86 Watt

GeForce 840A has an age advantage of 9 months, and 160.6% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 840A and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GeForce 840A
Intel HD Graphics P4700
HD Graphics P4700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 840A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 16 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.