TITAN V CEO Edition vs GeForce 8400M GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated83
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.19
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG86GV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)21 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed450 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600465.6
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPS14.9 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz848 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s868.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M GT 66
TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+25638%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 21 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 250 Watt

8400M GT has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

TITAN V CEO Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and TITAN V CEO Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GT is a notebook card while TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GT
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.