UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce 8400M GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.69
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameG86Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16256
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20020.80
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M GS 109
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+1490%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 15 Watt

8400M GS has 36.4% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GS and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GS is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8400M GS
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 40 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.