Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs GeForce 8400M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1420not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG86GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed400 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1506 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200192.8
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS6.169 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.16.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 200 Watt

8400M G has 1900% lower power consumption.

P5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M G and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 21 vote

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.