GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs 8400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 8400
2007
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.21

RTX 2070 Super outperforms 8400 by a whopping 22462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138769
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.52
Power efficiency0.5815.21
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 December 2007 (17 years ago)9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69.78 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82560
Core clock speed540 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors210 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate4.320283.2
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 8400 0.21
RTX 2070 Super 47.38
+22462%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 8400 81
RTX 2070 Super 18217
+22390%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1134
1440p-0−179
4K-0−151

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.72
1440pno data6.32
4Kno data9.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 94
+0%
94
+0%
Elden Ring 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 252
+0%
252
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 214
+0%
214
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 142
+0%
142
+0%
Elden Ring 156
+0%
156
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 168
+0%
168
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 198
+0%
198
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 249
+0%
249
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 128
+0%
128
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+0%
143
+0%
Valorant 194
+0%
194
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Elden Ring 92
+0%
92
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
World of Tanks 300−310
+0%
300−310
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+0%
123
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 138
+0%
138
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Elden Ring 47
+0%
47
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 164
+0%
164
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 73
+0%
73
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 47.38
Recency 4 December 2007 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 215 Watt

GeForce 8400 has 760% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has a 22461.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GeForce 8400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5077 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.