GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs 8400 GS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated308
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.39
Power efficiencyno data13.45
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT218GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed520 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1740 MHz
Number of transistors260 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160111.4
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mm242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.28.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 90 Watt

8400 GS PCI has 125% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS PCI and GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 645 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2486 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.