ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI vs GeForce 830A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.19no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGM108RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed1082 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate18.400.8
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 28 Watt

GeForce 830A has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE PCI, on the other hand, has 17.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 830A and Radeon 9200 SE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 830A is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 SE PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 830A
GeForce 830A
ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Radeon 9200 SE PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 830A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 SE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.