ATI 8514-Ultra vs GeForce 810A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking925not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.85no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGK208Mach8
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)1992 (32 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed719 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.13no data
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8ISA 16 Bit
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3VRAM
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s40 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

GeForce 810A has a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 810A and 8514-Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 810A is a notebook card while 8514-Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GeForce 810A
ATI 8514-Ultra
8514-Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 14 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate 8514-Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.