GRID K280Q vs GeForce 805A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.40
Power efficiencyno data2.26
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK208GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)28 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,875

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921536
Core clock speed719 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1395.36
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs16128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.53.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce 805A has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1400% lower power consumption.

GRID K280Q, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and GRID K280Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook card while GRID K280Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A
NVIDIA GRID K280Q
GRID K280Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.