Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs GeForce 7950 GX2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1223not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.33no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG71Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 June 2006 (18 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors278 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.003.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2006 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8240 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 7 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GX2 and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GX2
AMD Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 56 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.