GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs 7950 GX2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7950 GX2 with GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

7950 GX2
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
0.52

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms 7950 GX2 by a whopping 12494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3340.98
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71AD104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 June 2006 (18 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed500 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors278 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00386.3
Floating-point processing powerno data24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs24232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7950 GX2 0.52
RTX 4080 Mobile 65.49
+12494%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7950 GX2 201
RTX 4080 Mobile 25176
+12425%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−15400%
155
+15400%
1440p0−1102
4K0−168

Cost per frame, $

1080p599.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 191
+0%
191
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 149
+0%
149
+0%
Elden Ring 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 383
+0%
383
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Dota 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Elden Ring 257
+0%
257
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+0%
351
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 157
+0%
157
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Dota 2 165
+0%
165
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 323
+0%
323
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Elden Ring 172
+0%
172
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 122
+0%
122
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
World of Tanks 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+0%
237
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+0%
140
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Dota 2 144
+0%
144
+0%
Elden Ring 88
+0%
88
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+0%
144
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
+0%
144
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Dota 2 157
+0%
157
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

This is how 7950 GX2 and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 15400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 65.49
Recency 5 June 2006 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm

RTX 4080 Mobile has a 12494.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7950 GX2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GX2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 56 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 652 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.