Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs GeForce 7950 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1118not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.96no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG71Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 August 2006 (18 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$114.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2052.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.664 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs2440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 August 2006 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 15 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GT and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7950 GT
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 156 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.