GeForce FX 5800 Ultra vs 7950 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1121not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG71NV30
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 August 2006 (18 years ago)6 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$114.95 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed550 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors278 million125 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.204.000
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data213 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 August 2006 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm

7950 GT has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GT and GeForce FX 5800 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7950 GT
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.