Tesla C2070 vs GeForce 7900 GTO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.35
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG71GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2006 (18 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed650 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors278 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6032.14
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 238 Watt

7900 GTO has 193.8% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GTO and Tesla C2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GTO is a desktop card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
GeForce 7900 GTO
NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.