Tesla P6 vs GeForce 7900 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1179not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG71GP104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 March 2006 (18 years ago)24 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed450 MHz1012 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1506 MHz
Number of transistors278 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80192.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.169 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 March 2006 24 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 90 Watt

7900 GT has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla P6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GT and Tesla P6. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GT is a desktop card while Tesla P6 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT
NVIDIA Tesla P6
Tesla P6

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 41 vote

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla P6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.