Radeon RX 7950 XT vs GeForce 7300 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.03no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG73Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 May 2006 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$149.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5376
Core clock speed350 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3000 MHz
Number of transistors177 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8001,008
Floating-point processing powerno data64.51 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs8336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s800.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 300 Watt

7300 GT has 1150% lower power consumption.

RX 7950 XT, on the other hand, has a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7300 GT and Radeon RX 7950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
GeForce 7300 GT
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
Radeon RX 7950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 179 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 49 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.