ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs GeForce 7300 GT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7300 GT and Radeon HD 3650 AGP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

7300 GT
2006
128 MB DDR2, 24 Watt
0.36

ATI HD 3650 AGP outperforms 7300 GT by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12801260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.050.42
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG73RV635
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 May 2006 (18 years ago)23 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data120
Core clock speed350 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors177 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8005.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.174 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

7300 GT 0.36
ATI HD 3650 AGP 0.39
+8.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7300 GT 138
ATI HD 3650 AGP 150
+8.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.39
Recency 15 May 2006 23 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 65 Watt

7300 GT has 170.8% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3650 AGP, on the other hand, has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 7300 GT and Radeon HD 3650 AGP.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
GeForce 7300 GT
ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Radeon HD 3650 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 176 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.