Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GeForce 7150M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7150M and Radeon RX Vega 9, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega 9 outperforms 7150M by a whopping 11080% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1479 | 608 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.65 |
| Architecture | no data | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | C67 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (18 years ago) | 26 October 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 21 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−475%
|
21−24
+475%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−467%
|
16−18
+467%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−475%
|
21−24
+475%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−850%
|
38
+850%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−467%
|
16−18
+467%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−350%
|
18−20
+350%
|
| World of Tanks | 9−10
−900%
|
90−95
+900%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−475%
|
21−24
+475%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−1075%
|
45−50
+1075%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 35−40 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 5−6 |
Full HD
Low Preset
| Elden Ring | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Elden Ring | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 9 is 1075% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 9 is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (53%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.05 | 5.59 |
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 26 October 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
RX Vega 9 has a 11080% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 9 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
