GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs 705M

Place in the ranking	1058	179
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.45	18.33
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF119	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	27 September 2013 (11 years ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	1920
Core clock speed	475 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.800	144.0
Floating-point processing power	0.0912 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	8	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Standard memory configuration	DDR3	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 2560x1600	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 2560x1600	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
G-SYNC support	-	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −3267%	101 +3267%
1440p	2−3 −2900%	60 +2900%
4K	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1533%

45−50
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1720%	91 +1720%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2100%	88 +2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1533%	45−50 +1533%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −10400%	105 +10400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3567%	110 +3567%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −36500%	366 +36500%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1283%	83 +1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1493%	223 +1493%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −4900%	100 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1750%	148 +1750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −609%	227 +609%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2040%	107 +2040%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1533%	45−50 +1533%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −8400%	85 +8400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2633%	82 +2633%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −27900%	280 +27900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1150%	75 +1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1300%	196 +1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −3650%	75 +3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1438%	123 +1438%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −464%	60−65 +464%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −494%	190 +494%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −900%	50 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1350%	58 +1350%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1533%	45−50 +1533%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6100%	62 +6100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −8700%	88 +8700%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1000%	66 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −571%	94 +571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1238%	107 +1238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −445%	60 +445%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −18.8%	38 +18.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3850%

79
+3850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −6400%	65 +6400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2600%	54 +2600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3900%	40 +3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	42
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −557%	46 +557%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1650%	70 +1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	35−40
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −4100%	210 +4100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1450%

62
+1450%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2400%	25 +2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2100%	22 +2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	20
Far Cry 5	0−1	21

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1400%

30
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +0%	71 +0%
Battlefield 5	119 +0%	119 +0%
Metro Exodus	130 +0%	130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +0%	56 +0%
Battlefield 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +0%	38 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	246 +0%	246 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	32 +0%	32 +0%
Hitman 3	28 +0%	28 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	86 +0%	86 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +0%	39 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 +0%	15 +0%

This is how GeForce 705M and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 3267% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 2900% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 4200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 36500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.18	30.44
Recency	27 September 2013	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	115 Watt

GeForce 705M has 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2479.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.