Tesla C2070 vs GeForce 705A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.35
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF119GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2013 (11 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48448
Core clock speed738 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors292 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90432.14
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 238 Watt

GeForce 705A has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1486.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 705A and Tesla C2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 705A is a notebook card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 705A
GeForce 705A
NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 5 votes

Rate GeForce 705A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.