UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce 7000M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7000M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms 7000M by a whopping 15133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1486 | 657 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.24 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | C67 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (18 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 18 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
11
+1000%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−425%
|
21
+425%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−340%
|
22
+340%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−325%
|
17
+325%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−875%
|
35−40
+875%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
| World of Tanks | 8−9
−213%
|
25
+213%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−180%
|
14
+180%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−300%
|
16
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−875%
|
35−40
+875%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 30−35 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−225%
|
12−14
+225%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Full HD
Low Preset
| Elden Ring | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Elden Ring | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 27 tests (47%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (53%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.03 | 4.57 |
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 15133.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
