ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 vs GeForce 7000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7000M with Radeon Xpress 1100, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 7000M
2006
0.03

ATI Xpress 1100 outperforms 7000M by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14931473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameC67RC410
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)17 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores36
Core clock speed1 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.6
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemorySystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 7000M 0.03
ATI Xpress 1100 0.09
+200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7000M 13
ATI Xpress 1100 34
+162%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
World of Tanks 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the ATI Xpress 1100 is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Xpress 1100 is ahead in 7 tests (25%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (75%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.03 0.09
Recency 1 February 2006 17 October 2007
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm

GeForce 7000M has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Xpress 1100, on the other hand, has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon Xpress 1100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7000M is a notebook card while Radeon Xpress 1100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M
ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
Radeon Xpress 1100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.