RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 7000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7000M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 7000M
2006
0.03
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
37.87
+126133%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 7000M by a whopping 126133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1493116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.63
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC67no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33072
Core clock speed1 MHzno data
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16000 MHz
Shared memory+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 7000M 0.03
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37.87
+126133%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7000M 13
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15163
+116538%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−125733%
7550−7600
+125733%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−125733%
7550−7600
+125733%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−124900%
3750−3800
+124900%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−125733%
7550−7600
+125733%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−125733%
7550−7600
+125733%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−124900%
5000−5050
+124900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−124900%
3750−3800
+124900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−124900%
5000−5050
+124900%
World of Tanks 8−9
−125525%
10050−10100
+125525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−125733%
7550−7600
+125733%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−125733%
7550−7600
+125733%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−124900%
5000−5050
+124900%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−124900%
3750−3800
+124900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−124900%
5000−5050
+124900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−124900%
3750−3800
+124900%
Valorant 4−5
−124900%
5000−5050
+124900%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−125900%
18900−18950
+125900%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−125900%
18900−18950
+125900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−125900%
18900−18950
+125900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−124900%
2500−2550
+124900%
Dota 2 14−16
−125900%
18900−18950
+125900%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.03 37.87
Recency 1 February 2006 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 126133.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7000M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 25 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7000M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.