ATI Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 6200 TurboCache

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6200 TurboCache and Radeon HD 4810, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

6200 TurboCache
2004
64 MB DDR
0.14

ATI HD 4810 outperforms 6200 TurboCache by a whopping 1329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1425896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.44
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV44 B2RV770
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 December 2004 (20 years ago)28 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed350 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors75 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40020.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length165 mm246 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

6200 TurboCache 0.14
ATI HD 4810 2.00
+1329%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

6200 TurboCache 53
ATI HD 4810 769
+1351%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 2.00
Recency 15 December 2004 28 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm

ATI HD 4810 has a 1328.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 4810 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 TurboCache in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache
GeForce 6200 TurboCache
ATI Radeon HD 4810
Radeon HD 4810

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 59 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.