GRID M10-8Q vs GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.41
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameNV44 A2GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 December 2004 (19 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed350 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1306 MHz
Number of transistors75 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40052.24
Floating-point processing powerno data1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s83.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2004 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm

GRID M10-8Q has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache and GRID M10-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache is a desktop card while GRID M10-8Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
GRID M10-8Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M10-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.