Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.49
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV44 A1Vega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date11 October 2004 (20 years ago)14 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed300 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1283 MHz
Number of transistors75 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200102.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.284 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz740 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 20 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB and Radeon Pro Vega 20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB
GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 35 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 86 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.