Radeon 610M vs GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated788
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Power efficiencyno data13.24
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV44 A1Dragon Range
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors75 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20017.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed275 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

Radeon 610M has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB and Radeon 610M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB is a desktop card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB
GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 35 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 747 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.