Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.38
Power efficiencyno data6.67
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameC61Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2004 (20 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed425 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.4334.62
Floating-point processing powerno data1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs132

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 2 July 2019
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Pro WX 3200 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430 and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430
GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 343 votes

Rate GeForce 6150 SE nForce 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.