RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.75

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms 610M by a whopping 8436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.3334.09
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF119AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486144
Core clock speed738 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors292 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate5.904417.6
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs480
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.02
+8436%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 290
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24696
+8416%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 610M 1364
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 148452
+10784%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−8233%
1000−1050
+8233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−8287%
2600−2650
+8287%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−8233%
1000−1050
+8233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−8400%
850−900
+8400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−8287%
2600−2650
+8287%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Hitman 3 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−8233%
1000−1050
+8233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−8400%
850−900
+8400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−8287%
2600−2650
+8287%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 64.02
Recency 1 December 2011 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 130 Watt

GeForce 610M has 983.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 8436% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 738 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 36 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.