P106-100 vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.75

P106-100 outperforms 610M by a whopping 2115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1150323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.339.59
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF119GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)19 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481280
Core clock speed738 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1709 MHz
Number of transistors292 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate5.904136.7
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs448
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75
P106-100 16.61
+2115%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 290
P106-100 6408
+2110%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 610M 1381
P106-100 36407
+2536%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2067%
260−270
+2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1997%
650−700
+1997%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2067%
260−270
+2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1997%
650−700
+1997%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2067%
260−270
+2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1997%
650−700
+1997%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 16.61
Recency 1 December 2011 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce 610M has 900% lower power consumption.

P106-100, on the other hand, has a 2114.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook card while P106-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 714 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 168 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.