Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs GeForce 510 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated8
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.71
Power efficiencyno data15.57
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF119Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 September 2011 (13 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486144
Core clock speed523 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2498 MHz
Number of transistors292 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate4.184959.2
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm287 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed898 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.37 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2011 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 355 Watt

510 OEM has 1320% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 510 OEM and Radeon RX 7900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GeForce 510 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 22 votes

Rate GeForce 510 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3674 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.