Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs GeForce 320M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1222not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.61no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC89Viola
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483840
Core clock speed450 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors486 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200564.0
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Lengthno data386 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 7 November 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 232 Watt

GeForce 320M has 908.7% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 56 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.