GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs 320M

Place in the ranking	1218	207
Place by popularity	not in top-100	88
Power efficiency	1.62	24.23
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	C89	GA106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2010 (14 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	2560
Core clock speed	450 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1035 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.200	82.80
Floating-point processing power	0.0912 TFLOPS	5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	16	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 320M 0.54

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.29
+4769%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10143
+4753%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21 −257%	75 +257%
1440p	0−1	43
4K	0−1	27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1967%

62
+1967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1600%	50−55 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1867%	59 +1867%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1500%	80 +1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1050%	110−120 +1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1317%	85−90 +1317%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −670%	231 +670%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1600%	50−55 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1400%	45 +1400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1440%	77 +1440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1050%	110−120 +1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1650%	105 +1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −440%	50−55 +440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −577%	203 +577%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1600%	50−55 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1240%	67 +1240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −820%	92 +820%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1400%	90 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −400%	50 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +7.1%	28 −7.1%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−3700%

35−40
+3700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	24−27
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2100%	22 +2100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −667%	46 +667%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −2200%	69 +2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −13800%	139 +13800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1767%

56
+1767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	12−14

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1350%

29
+1350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +0%	60 +0%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	143 +0%	143 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 +0%	35 +0%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	114 +0%	114 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	78 +0%	78 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 +0%	26 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 +0%	26 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 +0%	61 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	20 +0%	20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	47 +0%	47 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 +0%	29 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	34 +0%	34 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 +0%	10 +0%

This is how GeForce 320M and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 257% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 320M is 7% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 13800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce 320M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 34 tests (49%)
there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	26.29
Recency	1 April 2010	11 May 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	75 Watt

GeForce 320M has 226.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4768.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.