GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs 310M

Place in the ranking	1326	39
Place by popularity	not in top-100	19
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	83.14
Power efficiency	1.53	25.52
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT218	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	10 January 2010 (15 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	4352
Core clock speed	606 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.848	344.8
Floating-point processing power	0.04896 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	73	no data
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	8	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	10.67 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 310M 0.30

RTX 4060 Ti 56.86
+18853%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 310M 121

RTX 4060 Ti 22769
+18717%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −18233%	1100−1150 +18233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −18233%	1100−1150 +18233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −18650%	750−800 +18650%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −18233%	1100−1150 +18233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −18471%	1300−1350 +18471%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −18233%	1100−1150 +18233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −18650%	750−800 +18650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −17900%	900−950 +17900%
World of Tanks	12−14 −18746%	2450−2500 +18746%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −18233%	1100−1150 +18233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −18471%	1300−1350 +18471%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −18233%	1100−1150 +18233%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−17400%

350−400
+17400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −18233%	550−600 +18233%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −18650%	750−800 +18650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −18650%	750−800 +18650%
Valorant	4−5 −18650%	750−800 +18650%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −18567%	2800−2850 +18567%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −18567%	2800−2850 +18567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −17900%	180−190 +17900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −18567%	2800−2850 +18567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Dota 2	14−16 −18567%	2800−2850 +18567%
Valorant	0−1	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.30	56.86
Recency	10 January 2010	18 May 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	160 Watt

GeForce 310M has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 18853.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 310M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 310M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce 310M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 310M

Radeon HD 6310

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

GeForce 310M

GeForce GT 220M

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

HD 7410M

Mobility Radeon HD 5145

GeForce 8400M GT

Mobility Radeon HD 545v

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Mobility Radeon HD 2700

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 459 votes

Rate GeForce 310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

4 9606 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 310M or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.