STG-2000X vs GeForce 305M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)no data
GPU code namen11m-lp1NV1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (14 years ago)30 September 1995 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed525 MHz12 MHz
Number of transistors260 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.2000.01
Floating-point performance0.0368 gflopsno data
Gigaflops55no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3EDO
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 700 (DDR3), Up to 700 (GDDR3) MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s300.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)1.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 30 September 1995
Chip lithography 40 nm 500 nm

GeForce 305M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 305M and STG-2000X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 305M is a notebook card while STG-2000X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 305M
GeForce 305M
NVIDIA STG-2000X
STG-2000X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate STG-2000X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.