UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce 3 Go
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1019 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.79 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 (2021) |
| GPU code name | no data | Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2002 (22 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 24 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 27 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 32 / 64 / 128 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 February 2002 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 4 Watt |
GeForce 3 Go has 100% lower power consumption.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 3 Go and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
